To choose between the election bets and the options strangles shown in the "SNIPER STRANGLE ai" table, let's break down the two types of potential returns:
### 1. Election Bets
- **Trump**: $1 payoff for every $58 bet. This implies a return of approximately 1.72% on your bet.
- **Kamala**: $0.42 payoff for every dollar bet, or a 42% return on your bet.
### 2. Options Strangles
From the table, each "Strangle Premium" represents the total cost of the strangle, and the "Expected % Profit" column shows the estimated percentage profit.
To compare:
- **Highest Expected % Profit**: *NFLX*, with a 320% expected profit.
- Other notable options include *META* (109%), *NVDA* (107%), and *XOM* (95%).
### Conclusion
Based purely on potential returns:
- The election bet on Kamala has a 42% return, which is lower than most of the options strangles with high expected returns.
- The NFLX strangle, for example, has a much higher expected profit (320%), which is significantly more attractive.
If your risk tolerance allows, **NFLX** or other options with high expected profits like *META* or *NVDA* would be a better choice than either election bet. However, options strangles are more volatile and complex than a straightforward election bet, so the choice depends on your comfort with the risks involved in options trading.