Get started
INTEL CORP. DL-,001II

INTEL CORP. DL-,001

17.858EURD
+0.220+1.25%
At close at Jul 28, 20:57 GMT
EUR
No trades
See on Supercharts
Overview Financials News
Ideas
Discussions Technicals Forecast Seasonals Bonds

INL trade ideas

Intel - This might be the bottom!Intel - NASDAQ:INTC - might create a bottom: (click chart above to see the in depth analysis👆🏻) For almost an entire year, Intel has been consolidating at a major horizontal support. Considering the previous significant bloodbath, Intel might soon find its bottom, which is inevitably followed by a major bullish reversal. After all, market structure is slowly shifting bullish. Levels to watch: $20.0, $25.0 Keep your long term vision! Philip (BasicTrading)
NASDAQ:INTCLong
by basictradingtv
8
Intel poised for a breakoutIntel NASDAQ:INTC is quite possibly poised for a breakout, as we look at a triangle formation here on the 3W chart, roughly ten months in the making, beside consolidating momentum. Longer term timeframes are good for determining the main trend in a stock's price. On the short term 4H timeframe, better suited for trade entry and exit signals, an inverted head & shoulders pattern has formed both in price and momentum. Fundamentally, Intel shares are arguably cheap, with a discount to Net Asset Value that began in 3Q 2024. A stock trading at a discount to net asset value is selling for less than the per‐share value of its assets minus liabilities.
NLong
by quickshiftinn
1
WHAT'S THE FATE OF INTEL CORPORATION STOCK?From the perspective of technical analysis, INTC is approaching a key psychological level at $19. In addition, it's in a downtrend. If the key level should hold by pushing price higher, leading to a break out of the downtrend line and closing with a strong bullish candle above the down trend line and resistance level around $22, this will indicate a strong bullish signal. Likewise, this is supported by a bullish divergence signal from the awesome oscillator. Otherwise, a failure of the psychological level of $19 may lead to price dropping further. Furthermore, we need to look beyond technical analysis. Fundamental analysis also has some insights for our decisions. Fundamentals for INTC established a bearish bias. The summary is as follows: Financial Health: • Negative EPS (-$4.47): Intel is losing money. • High Debt ($50B): This can limit growth and increase risk. • Declining Revenue: Sales dropped from $80B (2021) to $51B (2024). Valuation: • Cheap P/S (1.66x), but no P/E (due to negative earnings). • Dividend yield (2.56%) is at risk of being cut. Sentiment: Stock price fell from $56 to $19.55 (65% drop). Institutional investors may be wary. Fundamentally, INTC is weak — best suited for speculative, long-term bets (if you believe in a turnaround). Strategy for Traders: 1. Conservative Approach: - Wait for: - Break out of downtrend line and resistance around $22 and positive earnings/news. - Rising volume to confirm momentum. - Target: $27–$30 - Stop-loss: Below $17 (apply proper risk management). 2. Aggressive Approach: - Buy near $18–$19 with tight stop-loss ($16). - Target resistance level at $22. 3. Avoid If: - You’re risk-averse or prefer stable companies. - Intel’s debt/revenue trends worsen. Note: - Short-Term Trade: Only if breakout confirms ($22+). High risk, but possible 20% bounce. - Long-Term Investment: Avoid unless Intel shows profit/debt improvement. Always use stop-losses —Intel’s fundamentals make it volatile. Disclaimer: This is not a financial advice. The outcome maybe different from the projection. Don't take the signal if you can't accept the risk.
N
by KofTFx
WHAT'S THE FAITH OF INTEL CORPORATION STOCK? From the perspective of technical analysis, INTC is approaching a key psychological level at $19. In addition, it's in a downtrend. If the key level should hold by pushing price higher, leading to a break out of the downtrend line and closing with a strong bullish candle above the down trend line and resistance level around $22, this will indicate a strong bullish signal. Likewise, this is supported by a bullish divergence signal from the awesome oscillator. Otherwise, a failure of the psychological level of $19 may lead to price dropping further. Furthermore, we need to look beyond technical analysis. Fundamental analysis also has some insights for our decisions. Fundamentals for INTC established a bearish bias. The summary is as follows: Financial Health : • Negative EPS (-$4.47): Intel is losing money. • High Debt ($50B): This can limit growth and increase risk. • Declining Revenue: Sales dropped from $80B (2021) to $51B (2024). Valuation: • Cheap P/S (1.66x), but no P/E (due to negative earnings). • Dividend yield (2.56%) is at risk of being cut. Sentiment: Stock price fell from $56 to $19.55 (65% drop). Institutional investors may be wary. Fundamentally, INTC is weak — best suited for speculative, long-term bets (if you believe in a turnaround). Strategy for Traders: 1. Conservative Approach: - Wait for: - Break out of downtrend line and resistance around $22 and positive earnings/news. - Rising volume to confirm momentum. - Target: $27–$30 - Stop-loss: Below $17 (apply proper risk management). 2. Aggressive Approach: - Buy near $18–$19 with tight stop-loss ($16). - Target resistance level at $22. 3. Avoid If: - You’re risk-averse or prefer stable companies. - Intel’s debt/revenue trends worsen. Note: - Short-Term Trade: Only if breakout confirms ($22+). High risk, but possible 20% bounce. - Long-Term Investment: Avoid unless Intel shows profit/debt improvement. Always use stop-losses —Intel’s fundamentals make it volatile. Disclaimer: This is not a financial advice. The outcome maybe different from the projection. Don't take the signal if you can't accept the risk.
N
by KofTFx
2
INTEL INTC Short setup target 15.29Fibonacci technical analysis : Intel Corporation NASDAQ:INTC has already found resistance at the Fib level 61.8% (23.07) of my Down Fib. The May 30th Daily candle has closed below retracement Fib level 23.6% (19.73), confirming a sell signal. A Bear Flag pattern has also formed. My Down Fib guides me to look for NASDAQ:INTC to eventually go down to hit first target at Fib level -27.2% (15.29). NASDAQ:INTC – Target 1 at -27.2% (15.29), Target 2 at -61.8% (12.26) and Target 3 at -78.6 (10.79) Stop loss slightly above the 50.0% retracement Fib level (22.04). Enjoy the trading process and take time to smell the roses🌹
NShort
by rose_excellence
INTC: Watching the Wedge – Key Support Levels in FocusGM, y'all. Not a flashy chart -- just laying out the key levels I’m tracking. Price is respecting the descending wedge, trading between clearly defined trendlines. My bias leans lower here. Watching that S-1 zone near $18.96 as the next potential support. If that fails, S-2 at the lower trendline could come into play. FWIW: Closed out my short puts with a solid gain--now waiting for the next setup. If either level hits, I’ll be looking to sell premium again where the risk/reward skews back in my favor. 👀 GLTA.
N
by BluntForceOptions
INTC Weekly Options Trade Plan 2025-05-26INTC Weekly Analysis Summary (2025-05-26) Model Summaries Grok/xAI Report Technicals: INTC at $20.05, below 10/50 EMAs on M5 and well below 200 EMA; RSI(10) ~36 signals bearish momentum; MACD negative; price near lower Bollinger Band. Sentiment: VIX elevated at 22.29; mixed news but bearish outweighs bullish; options max pain at $21 may cap upside. Recommendation: Buy $20.00 weekly put at $0.41; profit target $0.62 (50% gain); stop-loss $0.20 (50% premium loss); hold to May 30 expiry. Confidence 65%. Claude/Anthropic Report Technicals: Strong short‐ and medium‐term bearish (price below all EMAs, RSI ~36–38, MACD negative, volume spike confirms selloff). Sentiment: Rising VIX, negative headlines, heavy put OI at $20 strike. Max pain $21 above spot. Recommendation: Buy $20.00 weekly put at $0.41; primary target $0.62 (50% gain), secondary $0.72; stop‐loss 25% premium ($0.31) or if INTC >$20.15; exit by Wed EOD. Confidence 72%. Gemini/Google Report Technicals: Bearish on M5 and daily (below 10/50/200 EMAs, RSI weak but not deeply oversold, bearish MACD). Sentiment: VIX rising; negative news flow; put demand greater than calls; max pain less relevant vs. momentum. Recommendation: Buy $19.50 weekly put at $0.22–$0.25 limit; profit target $0.44 (100% gain); stop‐loss $0.11 (50% premium) or if INTC >$20.40; size 1 contract for small account; exit EOD. Confidence 75%. Llama/Meta Report Technicals: Daily and M5 bearish (price below all EMAs, MACD negative); RSI ~38 suggests possible bounce but trend remains down; price near lower Bollinger Band. Sentiment: VIX up; mixed news but bearish tilt; max pain $21 unlikely this week. Recommendation: Buy $20.00 weekly put at $0.41; profit target $0.615; stop‐loss if INTC >$20.50; hold to expiry. Confidence 70%. DeepSeek Report Technicals: Bearish momentum (below all EMAs, negative MACD, daily RSI ~38); support at $20.02–$20.03 and lower band at $19.41. Sentiment: Elevated VIX; mixed news; heavy put OI at $20 strike; call interest at $21 as resistance. Recommendation: Buy $20.00 weekly put at $0.41 midpoint; profit target $0.62 (50%); stop‐loss if INTC >$20.10; close by Thursday EOD. Confidence 65%. Areas of Agreement and Disagreement Agreement All models view INTC as bearish into weekly expiry. Consensus on buying puts, with most favoring the $20.00 strike. Targeting a 50% gain on premium and risking ~25–50% premium loss. Entry timing at market open and holding into expiry or early in the week. Elevated VIX and heavy put open interest reinforce bearish bias. Disagreement Gemini prefers the $19.50 put for greater leverage vs. $20.00 put. Stop‐loss levels vary: from $20.10 up to $20.50 underlying or premium-based stops. Exit timing differs: some through expiry, others midweek to reduce theta decay. Profit‐target aggressiveness: 50% vs. 100% gains. Conclusion Overall Market Direction Consensus: Bearish Recommended Trade Strategy: Buy single-leg naked put Option: INTC 2025-05-30 expiry, $20.00 strike put Premium: $0.41 per contract Entry Timing: At market open Profit Target: $0.62 (≈50% premium gain) Stop Loss: $0.20 (≈50% premium loss) Size: 1 contract Confidence Level: 70% Key Risks and Considerations Short-term oversold RSI may trigger a bounce around $20.00 support. Max pain at $21.00 could exert slight upward pressure if market stabilizes. Volatility drop (VIX normalization) could compress option premiums (vol crush). Weekly options have rapid theta decay; managing timing is critical. Liquidity and bid-ask spreads may widen at open—use limit orders. TRADE_DETAILS (JSON Format) { "instrument": "INTC", "direction": "put", "strike": 20.0, "expiry": "2025-05-30", "confidence": 0.70, "profit_target": 0.62, "stop_loss": 0.20, "size": 1, "entry_price": 0.41, "entry_timing": "open", "signal_publish_time": "2025-05-26 09:30:00 UTC-04:00" } 📊 TRADE DETAILS 📊 🎯 Instrument: INTC 🔀 Direction: PUT (SHORT) 🎯 Strike: 20.00 💵 Entry Price: 0.41 🎯 Profit Target: 0.62 🛑 Stop Loss: 0.20 📅 Expiry: 2025-05-30 📏 Size: 1 📈 Confidence: 70% ⏰ Entry Timing: open 🕒 Signal Time: 2025-05-26 11:39:04 EDT Disclaimer: This newsletter is not trading or investment advice but for general informational purposes only. This newsletter represents my personal opinions based on proprietary research which I am sharing publicly as my personal blog. Futures, stocks, and options trading of any kind involves a lot of risk. No guarantee of any profit whatsoever is made. In fact, you may lose everything you have. So be very careful. I guarantee no profit whatsoever, You assume the entire cost and risk of any trading or investing activities you choose to undertake. You are solely responsible for making your own investment decisions. Owners/authors of this newsletter, its representatives, its principals, its moderators, and its members, are NOT registered as securities broker-dealers or investment advisors either with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, CFTC, or with any other securities/regulatory authority. Consult with a registered investment advisor, broker-dealer, and/or financial advisor. By reading and using this newsletter or any of my publications, you are agreeing to these terms. Any screenshots used here are courtesy of TradingView. I am just an end user with no affiliations with them. Information and quotes shared in this blog can be 100% wrong. Markets are risky and can go to 0 at any time. Furthermore, you will not share or copy any content in this blog as it is the authors' IP. By reading this blog, you accept these terms of conditions and acknowledge I am sharing this blog as my personal trading journal, nothing more.
NShort
by quantsignals
Intel Breakdown Alert! Bearish Setup with High R:R Opportunity !📉 Intel Corporation (INTC) – Bearish Setup Analysis Timeframe: 4H | Ticker: NASDAQ:INTC | Exchange: NASDAQ 🔍 Technical Breakdown We are currently observing a potential bearish reversal on Intel Corp. following a clear breakdown from a rising parallel channel on the 4H chart. 🟦 Pattern Observed Price was previously moving within a rising channel, forming higher highs and higher lows – a typical short-term bullish structure. Recently, price broke down below the lower boundary of this channel, signaling a potential shift in momentum from bullish to bearish. 📌 Trade Setup Entry Zone: Between $20.22 – $20.06 Price is currently trading in this zone, presenting a potential short entry opportunity following the channel breakdown. Stop Loss: $21.77 Placed above the previous resistance zone and the broken channel. If the price reclaims this level, the bearish thesis is invalidated. Final Target: $17.70 This level represents a key support zone from previous price action and aligns with potential measured move from the channel breakdown. ✅ Why This Setup? Channel Breakdown A break below a well-defined channel often marks a change in trend. This gives a high-probability setup for trend reversal traders. Bearish Momentum Confirmation After the breakdown, price failed to reclaim the channel, and is now trading below the prior support, flipping it into resistance. Risk/Reward Ratio This setup offers an excellent R:R ratio, with downside potential toward $17.70 and a relatively tight stop just above the failed structure. Market Structure Alignment Lower highs and lower lows now appear to be forming post-breakdown, further confirming a potential bearish move ahead. 📉 Bias: Short 📈 Invalidation: Break and close above $21.77 🎯 Target: $17.70 🧠 Disclaimer: This is not financial advice. Always do your own research and manage your risk accordingly. Trade safe!
NShort
by momentumwls
1
Intel: The Silent Restructuring of a WedgeWhile NVDA steals the spotlight with AI fervor and vertical price action, Intel is moving with quiet intent. Under the surface of a noisy tech cycle, INTC is sculpting a formation that few are watching—but one that may offer asymmetric reward into year-end. 1. The Technical Setup Zoom out: we see the outline of a broad descending wedge stretching from the 2023 highs. Price is respecting the lower bound while starting to carve higher lows. However, momentum remains indecisive. Now zoom in: after failing the 21.90 test, INTC is fading back toward the 20.20–20.35 gap zone. What would be the most likely course of events? A slow gravitational pull to fill that gap, followed by a compression phase within the wedge. The most strategic spot for long exposure is not today, but after the retest. This is especially true if the volume stays low and the wedge keeps growing. 2. Macro Context While thousands of NVDA GPUs are being sold, INTC is strategically pivoting its industrial operations to regain control over chip production. As tensions rise over subsea cables involving Starlink, Taiwan, nearshoring, the brains of humanoid robots powered by INTC, and geopolitics, domestic semiconductor companies with foundry exposure are becoming increasingly strategic. INTC isn't the crowd favorite—but it may be the infrastructure sleeper. 3. The Options Play The December $25c offers leverage on a slow-grinding recovery, with IV priced modestly. A wedge breakout by Q4—fueled by either macro industrial tailwinds or sector rotation—could double these premiums even before delta ramps. This is not a "fast money" trade. It’s positioning before the wedge snaps, not chasing after it. Occasionally the best trades aren’t loud. They coil in silence. And when they move—they don’t look back.
NLong
by gumoca
Trade Setup Summary – INTC (Intel Corp)!📈 Current Price: $21.39 Pattern: Symmetrical triangle breakout (neutral-to-bullish bias) Entry Zone: ~$21.39 (breakout confirmation) Stop-Loss (SL): $21.04 (below triangle base/support) Targets: TP1: $21.91 (resistance – red line) TP2: $22.66 (major resistance zone – green line) 🧠 Technical Highlights Price has broken out of a tightening triangle pattern. Yellow resistance flipped to support. Volume not shown clearly but breakout candle shows good body. Risk/Reward: Favorable at ~1:2 if targets hold. 🎯 Bias: Bullish above $21.04. Neutral or bearish below this zone.
NLong
by ProfittoPath
Intel Corporation | INTCIntel reported second quarter earnings on Thursday, showing a return to profitability after two straight quarters of losses and issuing a stronger-than-expected forecast. the stock rose 7% in extended trading. Here’s how Intel did versus Refinitiv consensus expectations for the quarter ended July 1: Earnings per share: 13 cents, adjusted, versus a loss of 3 cents expected by Refinitiv. Revenue: $12.9 billion, versus $12.13 billion expected by Refinitiv. For the third quarter, Intel expects earnings of 20 cents per share, adjusted, on revenue of $13.4 billion at the midpoint, versus analyst expectations of 16 cents per share on $13.23 billion in sales. Intel posted net income of $1.5 billion, or 35 cents per share, versus a net loss of $454 million, or a loss of 11 cents per share, in the same quarter last year. Revenue fell 15% to $12.9 billion from $15.3 billion a year ago, marking the sixth consecutive quarter of declining sales. Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger said on a call with analysts the company still sees “persistent weakness” in all segments of its business through year-end, and that server chip sales won’t recover until the fourth quarter. He also said that cloud companies were focusing more on securing graphics processors for artificial intelligence instead of Intel’s central processors. David Zinsner, Intel’s finance chief, said in a statement that part of the reason the report was stronger than expected was because of the progress the company has made toward slashing $3 billion in costs this year. Earlier this year, Intel slashed its dividend and announced plans to save $10 billion per year by 2025, including through layoffs. “We have now exited nine lines of business since Gelsinger rejoined the company, with a combined annual savings of more than $1.7 billion,” said Zinsner. Revenue in Intel’s Client Computing group, which includes the company’s laptop and desktop processor shipments, fell 12% to $6.8 billion. The overall PC market has been slumping for over a year. Intel’s server chip division, which is reported as Data Center and AI, saw sales decline 15% to $4 billion plus Intel’s Network and Edge division, which sells networking products for telecommunications, recorded a 38% decline in revenue to $1.4 billion.moreover Mobileye, a publicly traded Intel subsidiary focusing on self-driving cars, saw sales slip 1% on an annual basis to $454 million and Intel Foundry Services, the business that makes chips for other companies, reported $232 million in revenue. Intel’s gross margin was nearly 40% on an adjusted basis, topping the company’s previous forecast of 37.5%. Investors want to see gross margins expand even as the company invests heavily in manufacturing capability. In the first quarter, the company posted its largest loss ever as the PC and server markets slumped and demand declined for its central processors. Intel’s results on Thursday beat the forecast that management gave for the second quarter at the time. Intel management has said the turnaround will take time and that the company is aiming to match TSMC’s chip-manufacturing prowess by 2026, which would enable it to bid to make the most advanced mobile processors for other companies, a strategy the company calls “five nodes in four years.” Intel said on Thursday that it remained on track to hit those goals. Nvidia has had an amazing run, but any emerging technology, such as AI, which is bottlenecked by a single company will have issues in growth. Consulting firm McKinsey has pegged the AI market to be worth $1 trillion by 2030, but also that it was in an experimental and in early phases of commercial deployment. While Nvidia will likely retain its leadership in GPU hardware as applied to AI for the foreseeable future, it is likely that other hardware solutions for AI systems will also be successful as AI matures. While technologist may quibble on specifics, all major AI hardware today are based on GPU architectures, and as such I will use the terms and concepts of AI hardware and GPU architecture somewhat interchangeably. One likely candidate for AI related growth may be AMD (AMD), which has had GPU products since acquiring ATI in 2006.However, unlike Nvidia, which had a clear vision for of general-purpose GPU products (GPGPU), historically, AMD had largely kept its focus on the traditional gaming applications. AMD has developed an AI architecture called XDNA, and an AI accelerator called Alveo and announced its MI300, an integrated chip with GPU acceleration for high-performance computing and machine learning. How AMD can and may evolve in the AI may be subject of a different article. Another contender for success in the AI applications using GPU is Intel, who is the focus of this article. Intel has maintained a consistent, if low key focus on GPU hardware focused on AI applications over the last decade. Intel’s integrated HD Graphics is built into most modern processor ICs; however, these are insufficient compared to dedicated GPUs for high-end inferencing or machine learning tasks. It has 2 primary GPU architectures in production release: In 2019 Intel Corporation acquired Habana Labs, an Israel-based developer of programmable deep learning accelerators for the data center for approximately $2 billion. Habana Labs’ Gaudi AI product line from its inception focused on AI deep learning processor technologies, rather than as GPU that has been extended to AI applications. As a result, Gaudi microarchitecture was designed from the start for the acceleration of training and inferencing. In 2022 Intel announced Gaudi2 and Greco processors for AI deep learning applications, implemented in 7-nanometer (TSMC) technology and manufactured on Habana’s high-efficiency architecture. Habana Labs benchmarked Gaudi2’s training throughput performance for the ResNet-50 computer vision model and the BERT natural language processing model delivering twice the training throughput over the Nvidia high end A100-80GB GPU. So, Gaudi appears to give Intel a competitive chip for AI applications. Concurrent with the Habana Labs’ Gaudi development, Intel has internally developed the Xe GPU family, as dedicated graphics card to address high-end inferencing or machine learning tasks as well as more traditional high-end gaming. Iris® Xe GPU family consists of a series of microarchitectures, ranging from integrated/low power (Xe-LP) to enthusiast/high performance gaming (Xe-HPG), data center/AI (Xe-HP) and high-performance computing (Xe-HPC). The architecture has been commercialized in Intel® Data Center GPU Flex Series (formerly codenamed Arctic Sound) and Intel® Arc GPU cards. There is some question on Xe GPU future and evolution. Intel has shown less commitment to the traditional GPU space compared to Gaudi. Nonetheless, it does demonstrate Intel ability to design and field complex GPU products as its business requires. Intel has many other AI projects underway. The Sapphire Rapids chips implements AI specific acceleration blocks including technology called AMX (Advanced Matrix Extensions), which provides acceleration inside the CPU for efficient matrix multiplications used in on-chip inferencing and machine learning processing by speeding up data movement and compression. Intel has supporting technologies such as Optane, which while cancelled as a production line, is available for their needs of a high-performance non-volatile memory, one of the intrinsic components in any AI product. Based on the above, Intel appears to have competitive hardware solutions, however if we look at Nvidia success in AI, it is a result of a much a software and systems focus as it is the GPGPU hardware itself. Can Intel compete on that front. Ignoring for the moment that Intel has a huge software engineer (approx. 15,000) resource, it also has- access to one of the leading success stories in perhaps the most competitive AI application – self driving cars. Mobileye, who was acquired by Intel in 2017, has been an early adopter and leader, with over 20 years of experience in automotive automated driving and vision systems. As such, Mobileye has a deep resource of AI domain information that should be relevant to many applications. Mobileye has announced that it is working closely with Habana, as related divisions within Intel. While Intel is in the process of re-spinning out Mobileye as public company, Mobileye Global Inc. (MBLY), at present Intel still owns over 95% of shares, keeping it effectively an Intel division. In looking at Intel, we have a company with the history, resources, and technology to compete with Nvidia and infrastructure. They have made significant investment and commitment to the emerging AI market, in times when they have exited other profitable businesses. It should also be understood that AI related product are a small percentage of overall Intel revenues (INTC revenue are more than twice NVDA, even if NVDA has 6x its market cap), and continues to keep its primary business focus on its processor and foundry business. Hopefully for shareholders, Intel continues to push their AI technology and business efforts. Their current position is that this is strategic, but Intel is in a very fluid time and priorities may change based on business, finances, and of course the general interest and enthusiasm for AI. It is always worth noting that AI as a technical concept is mature, and appears to be cyclical, with interest in the technical community rising and falling in hype and interest once every decade or so. I remember working on AI applications, at the time labeled as expert systems in the 1980s. If we are currently at a high hype point, this may be temporary, based on near term success and disappointment in what AI does achieve. Of course, as always, “this time is different” and the building blocks of effective AI systems currently exist, where for previous iterations, it was more speculative.
N
by moonypto
4
INTEL BUY 2030Claro, aquí tienes el texto completamente limpio, sin negritas ni símbolos especiales: --- Preliminary Projection: Intel's Potential Workforce Transformation (2025–2030) As Intel continues its restructuring and integrates more AI-driven systems into its operations, significant changes are expected in its workforce distribution. The following outlines an estimate of the potential job displacement or transformation due to artificial intelligence by 2030. Area: Manufacturing - Percentage of total employees: 35% (approximately 40,000) - Percentage potentially replaceable by AI: 70% - Estimated replaceable jobs: 28,000 Area: Administration - Percentage of total employees: 20% (approximately 23,000) - Percentage potentially replaceable by AI: 55% - Estimated replaceable jobs: 12,500 Area: Engineering - Percentage of total employees: 30% (approximately 34,000) - Percentage potentially replaceable by AI: 20% - Estimated replaceable jobs: 6,800 Area: Sales and Marketing - Percentage of total employees: 15% (approximately 17,000) - Percentage potentially replaceable by AI: 40% - Estimated replaceable jobs: 6,800 Total estimated jobs that could be automated or transformed by AI: approximately 54,000, representing around 47 percent of Intel’s current workforce. --- Key Intel Facilities Focused on AI-Driven Automation Ohio, USA – Ohio One Campus Investment: Over 28 billion dollars Purpose: To become the world’s largest chip manufacturing hub for AI by 2027 Key technologies: Advanced automation, digital twins, and AI systems to optimize production and operational efficiency Source: Reuters Hillsboro, Oregon, USA – D1X Factory Function: Research and development center for next-generation manufacturing technologies Key technologies: AI-powered predictive maintenance, computer vision, and real-time analytics to improve efficiency and quality Source: Intel Newsroom These facilities reflect Intel’s strategic transition toward leading in both semiconductor innovation and intelligent manufacturing. The company’s integration of artificial intelligence across its industrial operations is expected to drive productivity, reduce costs, and reshape its employment structure. --- ¿Quieres que lo convierta ahora en PDF, en PowerPoint o en algún diseño tipo folleto?
NLong
by isantiagocano
INTEL CORPORATIONIntel’s stock has been falling sharply due to a combination of poor financial performance, strategic challenges, and market pressures, which have shaken investor confidence significantly. Key Reasons for Intel’s Stock Decline Weaker-than-Expected Earnings and Profitability Issues Intel reported disappointing earnings in 2024, with sales declining 2% year-over-year to $53.1 billion and gross margins under pressure. The company’s foundry business, a critical growth area, saw sales fall from $18.9 billion in 2023 to $17.5 billion in 2024. Analysts expect continued margin headwinds and limited revenue growth opportunities in the near term, which weighs heavily on the stock. Cost-Cutting and Dividend Suspension To address financial challenges, Intel announced a $10 billion cost-reduction plan, including cutting 15,000 jobs and suspending dividend payments starting Q4 2024. While necessary to preserve liquidity and fund restructuring, these moves have alarmed investors, signaling deeper operational issues and reducing shareholder returns. Leadership Changes and Strategic Uncertainty CEO Pat Gelsinger was replaced by Lip-Bu Tan in March 2025 amid ongoing struggles. The new leadership faces the difficult task of turning around the foundry business and improving Intel’s competitiveness in AI chips and manufacturing. However, uncertainty about the effectiveness of these efforts has dampened investor enthusiasm. Lagging Behind Competitors in AI and Manufacturing Intel has been slow to capitalize on the AI boom compared to rivals like Nvidia, which has surged ahead with AI-focused chips. Additionally, Intel’s manufacturing technology lags behind Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), limiting its ability to produce cutting-edge chips cost-effectively. This has led to market share losses, especially in PC CPUs, where AMD is gaining ground. Geopolitical and Market Risks Rising US-China tensions and new Chinese tariffs on semiconductor imports pose risks to Intel’s revenue, given its exposure to the Chinese market. Moreover, concerns about the semiconductor supply chain and the viability of Intel’s joint ventures with TSMC add to investor uncertainty. Valuation and Investor Sentiment Intel’s price-to-book ratio is near multiyear lows (~0.8), reflecting market skepticism about its asset utilization and future profitability. Its return on equity has declined steadily, contrasting with competitors that have benefited from the AI surge. Despite undervaluation, the stock’s poor recent performance and bleak near-term outlook continue to pressure the price. Summary Factor Impact on Intel Stock Weak earnings and margin pressure Significant negative Job cuts and dividend suspension Negative, signals financial stress Leadership change and strategy uncertainty Adds volatility and risk Falling behind in AI and manufacturing Loss of market share, investor concern Geopolitical tensions and tariffs Adds downside risk Low valuation but poor ROE Indicates undervaluation but cautious sentiment Conclusion Intel’s stock is falling badly due to disappointing financial results, strategic challenges in manufacturing and AI, cost-cutting measures that unsettle investors, and geopolitical risks. While the company is attempting a turnaround under new leadership, uncertainty about the success of these efforts and continued competitive pressures keep investor confidence low. The stock’s valuation reflects these concerns, and a sustained recovery will depend on Intel’s ability to improve profitability, regain market share, and capitalize on AI and foundry opportunities
NShort
by Shavyfxhub
Intel on the verge of a 80% plummet to $5** The months ahead ** After decades of semiconductor dominance, Intel faces unprecedented threats to its business model. AI computing revolution, manufacturing missteps, and relentless competition from AMD and NVIDIA have created what some analysts call "a potential death spiral" for the tech giant. The floor could be much lower than anyone realises, especially as the 2 month candle draws to a close in 14 days. On the above 2 month chart price action has closed under 30 years of legacy support. A trend line that gave up support on July 2024. That was shortly after publishing the “Incoming 60% correction for Intel Corporation” idea (below). Buckle up, we’re now looking at a 80% correction to $5. Why? Market structure has been comprehensively destroyed. For whatever reason, America does not want the rest of the world purchasing its products… internal orders only! This decision coupled with internal demand collapse creates the death spiral. Orders shall resume once the the protectionist experiment has come to pass, but until then, our greatest teacher.. history.. tells us nothing good will come from this experiment on businesses dependant on the world marketplace. Double tops in price, especially parted by some months, together with a confirmed bear flag are particularly powerful. Take the collapse of the Finnish bank OmaSp (below). Despite the negatively commentary, (really good contrarian confirmation!), the collapse to the floor follows. Is it possible price action ignores all the hullabaloo and reclaims legacy support? Sure. Is it probable? No. Ww “incoming 60% correction for Intel Corporation” Finnish Bank OmaSp collapse
NShort
by without_worries
17